« FDA Asks Public How to Define ‘Natural’? »- Perfumer & Flavorist

« Because of the changing landscape of food ingredients and production, and in direct response to consumers who have requested that the U.​S. Food and Drug Administ­ration (FDA) explore the use of the term « natural, » the agency is asking the public to provide information and comments on the use of this term in the labeling of human food products.

850_naturalgreenlabels

Specifically, the FDA asks for information and public comment on questions such as:

• Whether it is appropriate to define the term « natural »

• If so, how the agency should define « natural » and

• How the agency should determine appropriate use of the term on food labels.

The FDA is taking this action in part because it received three Citizen Petitions asking the agency to define the term « natural » for use in food labeling, with one Citizen Petition asking that the agency prohibit the term « natural » on food labels.

The FDA has noted that some federal courts, as a result of litigation between private parties, have requested administ­rative determin­ations from the FDA regarding whether food products containing ingredients produced using genetic engineering or foods containing high fructose corn syrup may be labeled as « natural. » (…)

Lire la suite…


Source:

Agro-Alimentaire- Actualités

Agro-Alimentaire- Actualités : Vote sur les nouveaux aliments, encourager l’innovation alimentaire; Neurogastronomy, a culinary and scientific collaboration; Hydrosol announces FI Europe plans ; UK Moringa-based beauty drink overcomes horrible taste; Olive oil emerges in ice cream, and Black Pepper could be next; Black Licorice: trick or treat ?; Etiquetage nutritionnel, la grande distribution présente son code alternatif aux 5 couleurs; L’expression « Lait végétal » déclarée illégale par l’UE


Recherche et Innovations

« Vote Sur Les Nouveaux Aliments : Encourager L’innovation Alimentaire »- Parlement européen

20151027PHT99775_original« Avez-vous déjà entendu parler des graines de Chia ou de l’huile raffinée de graines de Buglossoides arvensis ? Considérés comme des « nouveaux aliments », ces produits ont fait l’objet d’un vote en plénière aujourd’hui. L’objectif est de simplifier les procédures d’autorisation pour encourager l’innovation alimentaire tout en respectant les normes de sécurité. Le texte, adopté par 359 votes contre 202 et 127 abstentions, doit maintenant être approuvé par les États membres.
Ces dernières années, de nombreux nouveaux produits et ingrédients sont apparus sur le marché. Pourtant, la législation autour des nouveaux aliments date de 1997 : une actualisation de ces règles permettrait donc de mieux refléter les avancées scientifiques et technologiques en la matière. (…) »
Source :
http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/fr/news-room/content/20151023STO99022/html/Vote-sur-les-nouveaux-aliments-encourager-l’innovation-alimentaire

« Neurogastronomy: A Culinary And Scientific Collaboration »-Perfumer& Flavorist

dreamstime_l_532461942« It’s no secret the culinary industry is a major influence to flavor companies. When it comes to plating, a variety of factors affect taste perception, like color, smell and environmental surroundings. This developing field has the potential to shed new light on food-related illnesses, such as diabetes and obesity, as well as patients’ with a distorted sense of smell and taste due to Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, epilepsy and cancer. (..) »
Sources :
http://www.perfumerflavorist.com/flavor/research/Neurogastronomy-How-the-Brain–334659381.html
http://www.eater.com/2015/10/19/9553471/what-is-neurogastronomy

Ingredients

Actualités des entreprises

« Hydrosol Announces Fi Europe Plans »- Ingredients Network

Hydrosol-SIC-Food-2011_scale_xxl«At this year’s Food Ingredients Europe in Paris (December 1-3) stabilising systems provider Hydrosol will present what it describes as attractive new products that address international consumer trends. The focus is on all-in compounds for making vegan alternatives to meat and sausage products, cheese and mayonnaise. There are also new functional systems for whey desserts, sweet and savoury yogurt cubes as well as flavoured mild drinks and yogurt varieties with a high protein content. (…) »
Source :
http://ingredientsnetwork.com/hydrosol-announces-fi-europe-plans-news037663.html

Extraits de plantes

« UK Moringa-Based Beauty Drink Overcomes ‘Horrible’ Taste »- Nutra Ingredients

UK-Moringa-based-beauty-drink-overcomes-horrible-taste_strict_xxl« A herbal nutricosmetic drink is being launched in the UK utilising the amino acid-rich Himalyan herb, Moringa oleifeira, with the company involved saying it has overcome the ‘horrible’ taste of moringa. (…) »
Source :
http://www.nutraingredients.com/Manufacturers/UK-Moringa-based-beauty-drink-overcomes-horrible-taste

« Roquette Investit 40 Millions D’euros A Vic-Sur-Aisne »-Usine Nouvelle

000319628_5« Moyennant 40 millions d’euros, le groupe Roquette augmente la production de pois protéagineux sur son site de Vic-sur-Aisne (Aisne). Ce développement répond à la croissance de la demande mondiale pour les protéines. (…) »
Source :
http://www.usinenouvelle.com/article/roquette-investit-40-millions-d-euros-a-vic-sur-aisne.N359690

Arômes

« In Flavour: Olive Oil Emerges In Ice Cream, And Black Pepper Could Be Next »- Mintel

Ice Cream Recipes« Forget about clearing away the savory seasonings from your dinner table before dessert is served. Olive oil, sea salt and even black pepper are part of a popular ingredients trend in ice cream. The decadent combination of olive oil and ice cream emerged in retail brand offerings in 2015, gaining ground in foodservice and among bloggers for several years. Including olive oil in the recipe is said to provide texture benefits to ice cream, in that it adds an indulgently creamy – yet not oily – texture, while the flavour is said to add subtle grassy and nutty notes. While you’re most likely to find olive oil ice creams in restaurants and gelaterias in Italy, it has become a destination dessert at Otto’s Pizzeria in New York City and is also found in other restaurants across the US. Advocates of the combination even point to how olive oil is rich in naturally occurring antioxidants and fat-soluble vitamins such as vitamin E – although this is unlikely to bestow ice cream with a health halo. (…) »
Source :
http://is.gd/f8UWAs

Sécurité

« Black Licorice: Trick or Treat? «-FDA

CSk-_LqUsAEtDqp« As it turns out, you really can overdose on candy—or, more precisely, black licorice.Days before the biggest candy eating holiday of the year, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) encourages moderation if you enjoy snacking on the old fashioned favorite.So, if you’re getting your stash ready for Halloween, here’s some advice from FDA:If you’re 40 or older, eating 2 ounces of black licorice a day for at least two weeks could land you in the hospital with an irregular heart rhythm or arrhythmia.
FDA experts say black licorice contains the compound glycyrrhizin, which is the sweetening compound derived from licorice root. Glycyrrhizin can cause potassium levels in the body to fall. When that happens, some people experience abnormal heart rhythms, as well as high blood pressure, edema (swelling), lethargy, and congestive heart failure. (…) »
Source :
http://www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/ConsumerUpdates/ucm277152.htm

Réglementations

Etiquetage

« Etiquetage Nutritionnel: La Grande Distribution Présente Son Code Alternatif Aux 5 Couleurs »- La Depeche

shutterstock-28-52827143605-original« La fédération représentant les principales enseignes de grande distribution a rendu public ce mercredi son Système d’étiquetage nutritionnel simplifié (SENS), présenté comme une alternative au code à 5 couleurs, qui paraît jusqu’ici avoir les faveurs du ministère de la Santé.La Fédération des entreprises du commerce et de la distribution (FCD), à laquelle appartiennent notamment les distributeurs Auchan, Carrefour, Casino, Système U, a présenté mardi soir au ministère de la Santé, l’algorithme de calcul de ce projet d’étiquetage, composé de quatre flèches de couleurs (du vert au violet) reposant sur la fréquence et la quantité de consommation recommandée, en fonction de la qualité nutritionnelle de chaque produit. (…) »
Sources :
http://www.ladepeche.fr/article/2015/10/28/2206211-etiquetage-nutritionnel-grande-distribution-presente-code-alternatif-5-couleurs.html
Autre article :
« Etiquetage Alimentaire : La Distribution Présente Son Alternative »-Les Echos
http://www.lesechos.fr/industrie-services/conso-distribution/021437401005-etiquetage-nutritionnel-la-distribution-presente-son-alternative-1170051.php

Dénominations

« L’Expression « Lait Végétal » Déclarée Illégale par l’UE » ! »- Lait végétal

lait-vegetal« L’UE se soumet au diktat du lobby du lait et déclare illégale l’expression « lait végétal ». On peut lire dans le texte de loi (EU) 1308/2013, Annexe VII Partie III :
La dénomination « lait » est réservée exclusivement au produit de la sécrétion mammaire normale, obtenu par une ou plusieurs traites, sans aucune addition ni soustraction. »
Une décision pour le moins surprenante, alors que dans de nombreux pays, on a le droit de parler de « lait de soja » ou de « lait d’amande » . Il faudra donc désormais recourir à des euphémismes du type « boisson à base de » soja ou d’amande. (…) »
Sources :
http://www.laitvegetal.fr/?p=776
Texte de Loi : http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2013:347:0671:0854:FR:PDF

« FDA- Approved Drugs Boost Hair Regrowth In Mice »- Chemical & Engineering News

« Hair Loss: JAK-STAT inhibitors already being used to treat autoimmune disorders prompt hair follicles to reboot their growth cycles.

Although the idea of going bald typically conjures images of aging men, hair loss affects people of all genders and ages: Hair can fall out prematurely because of genetic predisposition, stress, drug side effects, or autoimmune disorders. A recent test of two FDA-approved drugs—ruxolitinib and tofacitinib—now suggests that a general treatment for all these hair loss conditions might be on the way (Sci. Adv. 2015, DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1500973).

A team of researchers at Columbia University had observed that these drugs—approved for the treatment of myelofibrosis and rheumatoid arthritis, respectively—promoted hair growth when fed to mice but also impaired the animals’ immune systems. So the scientists were curious whether the compounds might work better when rubbed onto the rodents’ skin rather than when administered orally. (…) »

Lire la Suite…

 1445895329038

« Hairy Situation- When treated topically on the right sides of their shaved backs with ruxolitinib (center) and tofacitinib (right), mice robustly regrew hair compared with a control (left). »


Sources:
Article published on 26.10.2015, by Judith Lavelle, on Site Chemical & Engineering News
http://cen.acs.org/articles/93/web/2015/10/FDA-Approved-Drugs-Boost-Hair.html

Autres articles
« Scientists Focus On Blocking Enzymes To Enable Hair Growth »- Cosmetics Design-Europe
http://www.cosmeticsdesign-europe.com/Formulation-Science/Scientists-focus-on-blocking-enzymes-to-enable-hair-growth
« Blocking Enzymes In Hair Follicles Promotes Hair Growth »- Science Daily
 http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2015/10/151023174914.htm
« Calvitie: 2 Médicaments Déjà Approuvés Confirment Leur Effet Repousse » – Santé Blog
 http://blog.santelog.com/2015/10/26/calvitie-2-medicaments-deja-approuves-confirment-leur-effet-repousse-science-advances/#sthash.JiFk3V4v.dpuf
« FDA-Approved Drugs Boost Hair Regrowth In Mice »- Chemical & Engineering News
http://cen.acs.org/articles/93/web/2015/10/FDA-Approved-Drugs-Boost-Hair.html

Publication : http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/1/9/e1500973

« Makeup Spooks U.S. Lawmaker »- Chemical& Engineering News

« Toxics: Citing study, senator warns that metals in novelty cosmetics can pose danger to kids

Lipstick, eye glitter, face paint, and other costume makeup—often made in China—may contain hazardous chemicals such as lead, warns Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.), referring to a study by a health activist group.

The senator is urging the Food & Drug Administration to set a limit for lead in cosmetics and beef up enforcement of packaging regulations, which require manufacturers to list all ingredients in cosmetics.

“Traces of lead and other heavy metals have consistently been found in Halloween and costume makeup from other countries and poses a great threat to the health of our children, especially during the fall season,” Schumer says in an Oct. 18 letter to FDA Acting Commissioner Stephen Ostroff. Schumer cites a 2009 study by the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics, a project of the Breast Cancer Fund, which found all 10 face paints it tested contained lead and six of the 10 had nickel, cobalt, or chromium. (…) »

Lire la Suite…

 09342-notw3-facepaintcxdConcerns about harmful metals in face paint grow

Source:
Article sur le site Chemical& Engineering News, Volume 93 Issue 42,  p. 5, News of The Week; Issue Date: October 26, 2015; Web Date: October 25, 2015
Author : Britt E. Erickson
http://cen.acs.org/articles/93/i42/Makeup-Spooks-US-Lawmaker.html

What Dermatologists, FDA Say about Halloween Makeup

« Spooky makeup fills novelty shops this time of year, but what did dermatologists and other experts have to say about safety and ingredients ?800_CT1510_Halloween_Makeup

As Halloween approaches, spooky makeup fills novelty shops this time of year. But what did dermatologists and other experts have to say about the safety of ingredients and color additives listed in these kits ?

C&T’s affiliate Skin Inc. features some Halloween makeup safety tips, which formulators can also consider this Halloween, from the the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and dermatology practices.

Check the ingredients

Heather Capps, a physician assistant with DermOne Dermatology Centers in Mesquite, Texas, says to check to make sure the Halloween makeup kit says it is non-toxic.

« Products that contain emollient laxatives, talc or hydrocarbons can be toxic, » said Capps.

Also, coal-tar hair dyes, which in the past were used in hair coloring but have since been reformulated by major cosmetics companies, are not intended to be used for staining the skin, according to the FDA. In the 1980s, some coal-tar hair dyes were found to cause cancer in animals.

The FDA published a regulation requiring a special warning statement for all hair dye products containing these two ingredients:

4-methoxy-m-phenylenediamine 2,4-diaminoanisole

2, 4-methoxy-m-phenylenediamine sulfate 2,4-diaminoanisole sulfate

In addition, many people might be unaware of the lead poisoning risk, in adults and children, from an easily avoidable source: the traditional eye cosmetic known as kohl, kajal, al-kahl or surma, the FDA said. The FDA said it has an import alert in effect for cosmetics containing kohl, not only because it is an unsafe color additive, but also because of labeling violations.

For example, the FDA said some samples have been labeled with the false statement, « FDA Approved. » Also noteworthy is that some manufacturers might label eye cosmetics with the term « kohl » simply to indicate the shade, not because the product actually contains kohl, the FDA noted. If the product is properly labeled, the FDA said consumers can check the ingredient declaration to determine whether it contains only color additives that are approved for cosmetic use in the area of the eye.

Make sure the colors are approved for use in face paint

Capps has a warning for those who might use food coloring or other ‘DIY’ skin-coloring products, such as natural and organic foods on their faces: Don’t do it.

« Some fruits and vegetables, such as blueberries, can stain your face for days, » Capps stated. « Citrus fruits can also have a chemical reaction in the sun, potentially causing burns and blistering. Just because it’s organic and good for your body doesn’t mean it needs to be on your face. »

The law says that color additives have to be approved by FDA for use in cosmetics, such as color additives in face paints and other cosmetics, including theatrical makeup. Check the Summary of Color Additives on the FDA’s web site. There’s a section listing approved colors for makeup, such as D&C Black No. 22004 (for use in eyeliner, brush-on-brow, eye shadow, mascara, lipstick, blushers and rouge, makeup and foundation, and nail enamel), D&C Black No. 3 (for use in eyeliner, eye shadow, mascara, and face powder), FD&C Blue No. 11982 (for use in cosmetics generally, allows MnO2 in manufacture and eye area use includes lake) and more.

If there’s a color in the makeup that isn’t on this list, the company that made it is not obeying the law, according to the FDA. Even if it’s on the list, the FDA said to check to see if it has FDA’s OK for use near the eyes and « if it doesn’t, keep it away from your eyes, » the FDA warned.

Glowin’ in the dark

According to the FDA, there are eight fluorescent colors approved for cosmetics, and like other colors, there are limits on how they might be used. None of them are allowed for use near the eyes ( Summary of Color Additives ).

These colors are:

D&C Orange No. 5, No. 10 and No. 11

D&C Red No. 21, No. 22, No. 27 and No. 28; and

D&C Yellow No. 7

As far as luminescent colors that glow in the dark are concerned, the FDA approved luminescent zinc sulfide in August 2000 for limited cosmetic use. It’s the only luminescent color approved for cosmetic use, and it’s not for every day and not for near your eyes, the FDA said. »


Sources:
Article of Nicole Urbanowicz
http://www.cosmeticsandtoiletries.com/regulatory/claims/What-Dermatologists-FDA-Are-Saying-about-Halloween-Makeup-334680391.html
http://www.skininc.com/skinscience/ingredients/Halloween-Makeup-Safety-Tips-For-A-Ghoulish-Glow–334154341.html

Cet article n’engage que son auteur/ This article is the sole responsibility of the author

Evolution & Implications of Analytical Testing in the Post-New York Attorney General World

UNPA Dietary Supplement Analytical Summit 

« The New York attorney general’s investigations of botanical dietary supplements have triggered a national debate over quality, labeling and analytical testing procedures, as well as a lot of negative media. Scores of class-action lawsuits have been filed. Settlements by GNC and Nature’s Way with the New York AG add a new dimension of testing requirements for ingredient vendors.

seminars

This two-day analytical summit will explain and examine critical issues, with the objective of arming attendees with the knowledge and insights needed to understand, adapt and succeed in a very fast-changing and unsettling dietary supplement marketplace. Ample time will be provided for Q&A and general discussion.

Nearly 20 world-class experts will present, debate, and discuss the current state of affairs concerning:

  •  The New York AG investigations, GNC and Nature’s Way settlements and the status of plaintiff class-action litigation against retailers and companies
  •  Other state attorneys general activities involving dietary supplements, quality testing and consumer protection
  •  The strengths and limits of DNA barcoding. How can it be integrated with established dietary supplement testing procedures?
  •  How are national retailers and brand leaders being forced to become a new gatekeeper of quality and regulatory compliance?
  •  How far will DNA barcoding go? What’s next: probiotics, protein, algae, animal byproducts or other categories of products? »

Date: Nov. 5-6, 2015
Event Type: Seminar
Venue: Salt Lake Marriott City Center Hotel, 220 S. State St., Salt Lake City, UT 84111

summit


Sources:
https://unpa.com/events
Press release : http://us1.campaign-archive2.com/?u=f7a77c83fbec812d8a08b4a61&id=ab0adea463&e=08eb371f81
Detailed program : https://unpa.com/assets/event/pdf_1/35/UNPA_DietarySuppAnalyticSummit_Full_PreProgram_v4_Email.pdf
Registration: https://unpa.com/login

Cet article n’engage que son auteur/ This article is the sole responsibility of the author

‘This Is Heating Up’: Studies Highlight Concerns Over Yohimbe Supplements

“There is increasing scrutiny of Yohimbe and Yohimbine supplements, with three papers published in 2015 reporting concerns over these supplements, including one last week from Harvard’s Dr Pieter Cohen.

This-is-heating-up-Studies-highlight-concerns-over-yohimbe-supplements_strict_xxlYohimbe – an evergreen tree species native to Africa – is the number seven top-selling herbal in the mainstream multi-outlet channel, according to HerbalGram’s 2014 Herb Market Report . However, in the natural channel it is not even in the top 20. The yohimbe market is growing at around 3 %, according to data from SPINS provided to NutraIngredients-USA. Combined sales in the natural and conventional multi-outlet channels for the 52 weeks ending September 6th 2015 hit $27.10 million, up from $26.25 million for the previous 52 weeks. It is reportedly found in more than 550 dietary supplements in the US .

Extracts from the Yohimbe (Pausinystalia johimbe) tree are used in products for sexual and physical performance; two categories that receive extra attention from the FDA. Products often list the ingredient as yohimbe extract, yohimbe bark extract, or yohimbine – the key alkaloid in the bark of the tree.

While the American Herbal Products Association’s Botanical Safety Handbook (Second Edition, 2013) notes that doses up to 10 mg of yohimbine three times per day are generally well tolerated, detrimental side effects associated with high doses of yohimbe include elevated blood pressure, increased heart rate, and anxiety.

“Any company selling yohimbe products should have their labels adequately articulated with appropriate warnings,” said Mark Blumenthal, founder and executive director of the American Botanical Council.

‘Concern’

Findings published in Drug Testing and Analysis by Cohen et al. indicated that only 2 of the 49 yohimbine supplement brands tested provided consumers with both accurate information about the quantity of yohimbine as well as information about the potential adverse effects.

Dr Cohen worked with scientists at the National Center for Natural Products Research at the University of Mississippi and Cornell University, and found that yohimbine levels varied greatly, from zero in some cases to 12.1 mg per recommended serving.

Only 11 of the 49 supplement brands listed a specific quantity of yohimbine on the label, added Cohen et al, while most of these were “inaccurately” labelled with actual contents ranging from 23% to 147% of the label claim.

The authors also reported that 39% of the supplements tested – or 19 out of 49 – did not contain corynanthine and rauwolscine, which are two alkaloids also found in the bark of P. johimbe. This suggested that the yohimbine in those supplements was either a “highly processed plant extract or synthetic in origin”.

“While dietary supplements often contained pharmaceutically relevant quantities of yohimbine, the supplement labels very infrequently provide consumers with accurate information regarding quantity of yohimbine or known adverse effects,” they wrote. “This is a particularly concerning finding given that many countries have already banned yohimbine from all over-the-counter products due to its potential serious health effects.”

Dr Cohen declined requests to comment directly to NutraIngredients-USA on this issue.

The products were allegedly purchased at GNC, Vitamin Shoppe, Walgreens, Walmart, CVS, RiteAid, and Whole Foods. All seven retailers were contacted prior to publication. Some did not respond, while others declined to comment because the paper does not disclose which specific brands were involved.

Vitamin Shoppe was the only retailer to respond to our request for comment, with Meghan Biango, its manager of corporate communications, saying: “The Vitamin Shoppe is committed to being our customers’ first choice for all of their health and wellness needs. Our third-party vendors represent to us that their labels are accurate and in compliance with all applicable laws. Additionally, none of the Vitamin Shoppe brand products contain yohimbine.”

Inconsistence with label claims

Two other studies published this year reported similar findings to the Cohen paper. One published in the Journal of AOAC International described an analytical method to rapidly determine if synthetic yohimbine was being used in products or if the products actually contained yohimbe bark or extract.

James Neal-Kababick, director of Flora Research Laboratories and co-author of the paper, explained, “This is an extremely sensitive method. We can determine if this material is synthetic yohimbine hydrochloride or if it is really yohimbe bark extract. A lot of these other alkaloids that might be in the bark extract have similar mass and similar structures and we were able to separate these and detect them”.

“We found levels and claims all over the place,” said Neal-Kababick. The authors purchased 10 products from dietary supplement stores in Oregon in the form of powders, gel caps, and tablets. The products and retailers were not identified.
“It is quite amazing how serious of an issue this is,” added Neal-Kababick, “and there is considerable risk to taking high doses of this alkaloid, especially when combined with caffeine and certain pharmaceutical drugs.”

The third paper, again published in the Journal of AOAC International , detailed the analysis of 17 yohimbe dietary supplements in tablet, capsule and liquid form purchased from local stores and over the internet using a UHPLC/MS system with a diode array detector, and then compared this with the suggested yohimbine intake amount listed on the product label. The researchers did not identify the brands nor did they report the retailers where the products were purchased.

“Our policy prohibits us to pass or fail the samples we tested,” said Pei Chen, PhD, research chemist at the Food Composition and Method Development Laboratory of the USDA, ARS, BHNRC, and lead author on the paper. “All I can say is the yohimbine content among the dietary supplements is inconsistent and, for some of them, inconsistent with the label claim as well.”

Tolerability

The papers have raised concerns, but Dr Rick Kingston, President, Regulatory and Scientific Affairs, SafetyCall International and Clinical Professor of Pharmacy, University of Minnesota, notes that he has not seen much in the way of serious adverse events being reported.
“We do have some companies [as clients at SafetyCall] with products with yohimbe as an ingredient but we don’t see much in the way of serious consequences,” he noted. “But the yohimbine content in those products is typically lower and that is only the SafetyCall universe.”

Dr Kingston told us that there is a relatively wide margin of safety for yohimbine and there is data to show that some individuals have tolerated large single doses without serious toxicity. But, sensitive individuals or those with medical conditions may not be able to tolerate even small doses.

“When you have people experiencing minor side effects such as restlessness or anxiety, a dose reduction may help but if not, they should stop using the product and the effects typically resolve spontaneously.” said Dr Kingston.
Commenting on the paper from Dr Chen at the USDA, Dr Kingston noted that their data showed that there is a 10-fold variation in yohimbine content. “If someone is taking a lower dose product without any problems and they switch to another product with a substantial increase, that could be a big deal,” he said.

FDA

Are yohimbe supplements are on the FDA’s radar? Several warning letters have been issued to companies marketing yohimbe bark products over the years, with the majority of those letters being for the claims being made (see list at the end of this article).

Marianna Naum, PhD, strategic communications and public engagement staff in the FDA’s Office of Foods and Veterinary Medicine, told NutraIngredients-USA that the agency is aware that yohimbe-containing products are targets for spiking with synthetic yohimbine.
“We continue to expand our understanding of this adulteration by reviewing the scientific literature, and product testing. Adulterated dietary supplements, including those with enhanced concentrations of the active ingredients beyond natural levels, remain a concern for the agency, and we will take appropriate action when necessary.”
“This is heating up,” noted Neal-Kababick. “It doesn’t surprise me that there is an increase in the attention around yohimbe.”


Sources:

Article by Stephen Daniells
http://www.nutraingredients-usa.com/Research/This-is-heating-up-Studies-highlight-concerns-over-yohimbe-supplements

Publications:

Drug Testing and Analysis (Open access article)
Published online ahead of print, doi: 10.1002/dta.1849
“Pharmaceutical quantities of yohimbine found in dietary supplements in the USA”
Authors: P.A. Cohen, Y-H. Wang, G. Maller, R. DeSouza, I.A. Khan

Journal of AOAC International (Subscription required for full access)
2015, Volume 98, No. 4, Pages 896-901
“Determination of Yohimbine in Yohimbe Bark and Related Dietary Supplements Using UHPLC-UV/MS: Single-Laboratory Validation”
Authors: P. Chen, N. Bryden

Journal of AOAC International (Subscription required for full access)
2015, Volume 98, No. 2, Pages 330-335
“Characterization and Quantitation of Yohimbine and Its Analogs in Botanicals and Dietary Supplements Using LC/QTOF-MS and LC/QQQ-MS for Determination of the Presence of Bark Extract and Yohimbine Adulteration”
Authors: D. Lucas, J. Neal-Kababick, J. Zweigenbaum

FDA warning letters about Yohimbe:

Maxam Nutraceutics/Maxam Laboratories for alleged drug claims (2010)
RT Naturals, LLC for alleged drug claims (2010)
Athletes.com, Inc./Higher Power, Inc./dba bodybuilding.com received a letter for alleged unsubstantiated structure/function claims (2006)
Bethel Nutritional Consulting, Inc . received a warning letter in 2014 for alleged drug claims.

Cet article n’engage que son auteur/ This article is the sole responsibility of the author

Tainted Dietary Supplements Frequently Hit The Market

« Every week for the past 7½ years, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration has identified an average of two dietary supplements being sold to consumers that were “tainted” and “potentially hazardous,” a C-HIT analysis of data reveals.

supplements1The supplements contained prescription drug ingredients, controlled substances or untested pharmaceutical ingredients, which is prohibited by federal law and “can pose considerable dangers to consumers,” including stroke, liver damage, kidney failure and death, according to the FDA.

C-HIT’s analysis of FDA data reveals 615 dietary supplements that were identified as tainted since Jan. 1, 2008. In the first half of this year alone, 59 tainted dietary supplements were posted on the FDA’s site.
In July, the U.S. Department of Justice took court action against two supplement companies in Montana and Iowa for illegally selling or distributing prohibited or misbranded products. While some violations prompt legal action, regulators acknowledge that they are overmatched in their ability to monitor the supplements.

The FDA says the tainted supplements in its database are a small fraction of the potentially hazardous products with hidden ingredients marketed to consumers on the Internet and in retail establishments.

U.S. Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., is calling for a crackdown on the dietary supplements industry. He is working with U.S. Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., to reintroduce the Dietary Supplement Labeling Act, which, Blumenthal says, would help consumers distinguish between supplements that are safe and those that may have serious side effects or drug interactions. The bill would require more information on product labels and give more authority to the FDA to require manufacturers to register their products and ingredients and provide proof of any health-benefit claims.

“The dietary supplement market is a dangerous Wild West of inadequate regulation” that deprives consumers “of basic health and safety information” and results “in serious injuries and deaths.” Blumenthal says. “Without more transparency regarding the dangers of these products—and more scrutiny over the often outrageous health benefit claims—consumers simply have no way to know what they are taking.”

Industry leaders say, however, that an overwhelming majority of companies sell safe products that include no illegal ingredients and are beneficial to millions of Americans.
Steve Mister, president and CEO of the Council for Responsible Nutrition, a trade group that represents supplement manufacturers, says the 150 “legitimate, mainstream” companies in his organization are responsible for a majority of industry sales and are committed to quality products and compliance with federal regulations.

Most adults ingest dietary supplements, which the FDA defines as vitamins, minerals, herbs, extracts and other products “that aim to add nutritional value to a diet.”
During the past 15 years, the industry has exploded in popularity, pushing annual sales to $35 billion, according to the trade group. About 150 million adults nationally, or 7 out of every 10, ingest dietary supplements, the organization says. The supplements are sold in various forms, tablets, capsules, powders, energy bars and liquids.

Unlike drugs, which are subject to FDA approval, companies can manufacture and sell supplements without the agency’s approval. The FDA can take action if a dietary supplement contains undeclared ingredients, is found unsafe or if there are false or misleading claims about it.

Concerns about the safety of dietary supplements were raised after a pre-mature infant died in October 2014 in a Connecticut hospital after being treated with a probiotic supplement that was found to contain mold. In November, FDA scientists confirmed the presence of a mold species, Rhizopus oryzae, in unopened containers of Solgar ABC Dophilus Powder, which had been collected at the Connecticut hospital where the infant died. The FDA did not reveal the name of the child or the hospital.

According to the FDA, the infant “suffered from gastrointestinal mucormycosis,” a fungal infection, and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention determined that mold caused the mucormycosis. Both agencies issued warnings following the infant’s death.

“The contaminant at issue was not identified at any point within the product’s supply chain under Solgar’s control,” says Andrea Staub, a spokeswoman for NBTY, the company that owns Solgar.
Staub says the findings were determined after “numerous facility and equipment inspections,” a review of operating procedures and tests of product samples by the FDA, CDC, independent laboratories and Solgar.
Blumenthal says the infant’s death underlines the need for better oversight of the supplements industry.

The FDA states that “some supplements are useful in reducing the risk of certain diseases” and can make related claims on their labels. For example, folic acid supplements may make a claim about reducing the risk of birth defects of the brain and spinal cord.
Dietary supplements “are not intended to treat, diagnose, cure or alleviate the effects of diseases,” according to the FDA.

Mister says small companies, particularly many that sell their products on the Internet, are giving the industry a bad rap. The “fringes of the industry” sell products they call dietary supplements to “get them under the FDA’s radar screen” but include anabolic steroids or other illegal drugs, Mister says.
Supplements marketed for weight loss, bodybuilding and sexual enhancement, which are often labeled as “all natural,” are the most frequent violators, the FDA says.

C-HIT’s analysis of another FDA database found numerous warning letters sent in recent years to dietary supplement manufacturers, including four in Connecticut. Warning letters are issued for significant violations that “may lead to enforcement action if not promptly and adequately corrected.”
In July 2014, the FDA issued a warning letter to Klein Laboratories after inspecting its manufacturing facility in North Haven. The label for the company’s bodybuilding product, Osteojuv, “revealed serious violations” of federal regulations, including claims that it targets pain and inflammation, according to the FDA. Klein Laboratories did not respond to a request for comment.

In May 2012, a warning letter was sent to Middletown-based NatureMost of New England because its C-Complex tablets “failed to establish” required “component specifications for identity, purity, strength and composition.

The company’s CEO, Robert Trigo, says his “products have always been above board,” and “it’s very easy to get a warning letter” for many reasons. He says the product was discontinued.
A May 2011 warning letter was issued to Farmington-based Prostar after FDA inspectors “found a number of violations” of manufacturing regulations, including Prostar’s “release” of two bodybuilding products, Ultra Ripped capsules and Higher Power 100% Whey Power protein shake, before product testing was completed and reviewed.

Brian Rubino, Prostar’s vice president, said that the company submitted a corrective action plan that the FDA approved.
In February 2011, the FDA issued a warning letter to Middletown-based RHG 7 Company, which operates under the name Vital Nutrients. The agency said the company’s four supplements were “prepared, packed or held under conditions” that did not meet federal regulations. In 2008, the FDA also sent a warning letter to the company pointing out its DMSA dietary supplement was a drug.

Sarah Roller, a lawyer representing Vital Nutrients, said the company “promptly and successfully” resolved both matters. After the 2011 warning letter, Vital Nutrients “knuckled down” and was told by the FDA that it was in compliance with federal regulations. After the 2008 warning, the company “immediately discontinued” use of DMSA and hasn’t used the ingredient since, she says. »


Source:
Article by Gary Stoller
http://c-hit.org/2015/09/20/tainted-dietary-supplements-frequently-hit-the-market/

Cet article n’engage que son auteur/ This article is the sole responsibility of the author

FDA Sends Warning Letter to Van Tibolli

“The United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a warning letter to Van Tibolli Beauty Corp. following its review of the GK Hair Taming System with Juvexin Curly and GK Hair Taming System with Juvexin Resistant hair smoothing products.

60613According to FDA, the products are adulterated within the meaning of Section 601(a) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 361(a)] and are misbranded within the meaning of Section 602(a) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 362(a)].

It is a violation of Section 301(a) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 331(a)] to introduce or deliver for introduction into interstate commerce any cosmetic that is adulterated or misbranded, FDA stated in its Sept. 2 letter sent to CEO Van Tibolli.

Under Section 601(a) of the Act [21 U.S.C. § 361(a)], a cosmetic is adulterated if it bears or contains any poisonous or deleterious substance which may render it injurious to users under the conditions of use prescribed in the labeling thereof, or, under such conditions of use as are customary or usual.

The conditions of use in the product labeling fail to include instructions to: use these products in a facility with adequate ventilation, avoid direct eye and skin contact, and avoid unnecessary repeated use.

According to FDA, the GK Hair Taming System with Juvexin Curly and Resistant products are adulterated because they bear or contain a deleterious substance that may render it injurious to users under the conditions of use prescribed in your labeling.

Specifically, based on product labeling and FDA sample analysis, the products contain methylene glycol, the liquid form of formaldehyde, which, under the conditions of use prescribed in the product labeling, releases formaldehyde when hair treated with the product is heated with a blow dryer and then with a hot flat iron. Methylene glycol is a deleterious substance, under the conditions of use prescribed in the current labeling.

FDA analysis of approximately 50 mg samples of the GK Hair Taming System with Juvexin Curly and Resistant confirmed the presence of 3.9 % and 4.85% methylene glycol, the liquid form of formaldehyde, respectively.

FDA notes that the primary route of exposure to formaldehyde, when using the GK Hair Taming System with Juvexin Curly and Resistant products under the conditions of use prescribed in the labeling, is through inhalation.

FDA notes that the product labels for the GK Hair Taming System with Juvexin Curly and Resistant declare the following:

• “INSTRUCTIONS: Shampoo client’s hair twice using GKhair pH+ Shampoo. Apply, then massage product ¼ inch from the root. Comb for even distribution. Blow dry client’s hair straight and smooth until 100% dry. Flat iron to seal cuticle. For detailed instructions visit http://www.GKhair.com.”

• “WARNING: Product releases formaldehyde. Information on the physical and health hazards, and the safety data sheet, may be obtained from Van Tibolli Beauty S.a.r.l. This product must be applied by hair professionals only. If you are nursing or pregnant do not use the product without first consulting your physician. If skin contact occurs, wash immediately. If ingestion or eye contact occurs, call a physician immediately. Salon professional and client must wear protective clothing. Keep out of reach of children. Store in a cool and dry place.”

Although the GK Hair Taming System with Juvexin Curly and Resistant product labels bears a warning statement, the warning statement and product labeling are inadequate. Specifically, they fail to reveal facts material with respect to consequences that may result from this use of these products under the conditions of use as follows:

1. They fail to inform the user of the adverse effects that may result from the release of formaldehyde into the air during the heating process, which can have both short term and long term health effects (e.g., eye and throat irritation, headache, dizziness, burning sensations, breathing problems, nosebleeds, chest pain, skin irritation and certain cancers), particularly for those who are sensitive to formaldehyde. Long term exposure may potentially cause certain cancers.

2. They fail to inform users that concurrent uses of these products in the same facility may increase the concentration of formaldehyde in the air, which could increase the risk of adverse effects.

We also note that while the GK Hair Taming System is targeted primarily for use by salon professionals in a salon setting, the product may also be used in home salon settings as the GK Hair Taming System with Juvexin Curly and Resistant hair smoothing products are also available for purchase in beauty retail stores and via the internet by the general public.

Consequently, FDA recommends Van Tibolli Beauty Corp. work with its distributors to ensure that GK Hair Taming System with Juvexin Curly and Resistant products are labeled in accordance with the requirements of the Act. »


Sources:
http://www.happi.com/contents/view_breaking-news/2015-09-23/fda-sends-warning-letter-to-van-tibolli/
https://www.pharmamedtechbi.com/publications/the-rose-sheet/36/39/fda-warns-embrazilian-blowoutemlike-brand-for-undeclared-formaldehyde-risks

Cet article n’engage que son auteur/ This article is the sole responsibility of the author

US FDA Awards 18 New Research Grants to Boost Product Development for Rare Diseases

« The US Food and Drug Administration has awarded 18 new research grants totaling more than $19 million to boost the development of products for patients with rare diseases, which affect the lives of nearly 30 million Americans.

DNA2-800x497

These new grants were awarded to principal investigators in ten states, with research spanning clinical sites domestically and internationally.

“The FDA is in a unique position to help those who suffer from rare diseases by offering important incentives to promote the development of products, one of which is our grants programme,” said Gayatri R. Rao, M.D., J.D., director of the FDA’s Office of Orphan Product Development.

“The grants awarded this year support much-needed research in 17 different rare diseases, many of which have little, or no, available treatment options.”

The FDA awards the grants through the Orphan Products Grants Programme to encourage clinical development of drugs, biologics, medical devices, or medical foods for use in rare diseases. The grants are intended for clinical studies evaluating the safety and effectiveness of products that could either result in, or substantially contribute to, the FDA approval of products.

Since its creation in 1983, the Orphan Products Grants Programme has provided more than $350 million to fund more than 570 new clinical studies and supported the marketing approval of more than 50 products.

Ten of the 18 awards fund studies that enroll paediatric patients as young as newborns. Two are funding studies related to sickle cell disease, specifically focusing on the extreme pain that patients, many of whom are children, suffer from and which serves as a leading cause of emergency room visits and hospitalisations in these patients. One of these studies evaluates the use of a medical device to treat children with acute kidney injury.

A total of 92 grant applications were received for this fiscal year. Twenty-five ad hoc panels comprising over 80 independent clinicians, scientists and researchers with expertise in these rare disease-related fields reviewed the grant applications and recommended the most promising research projects for funding.

The FDA, an agency within the US Department of Health and Human Services, protects the public health by assuring the safety, effectiveness, and security of human and veterinary drugs, vaccines and other biological products for human use, and medical devices. The agency also is responsible for the safety and security of our nations food supply, cosmetics, dietary supplements, products that give off electronic radiation, and for regulating tobacco products. »


Source:
http://www.pharmabiz.com/NewsDetails.aspx?aid=90722&sid=2

Cet article n’engage que son auteur/ This article is the sole responsibility of the author